Universal denies ‘Wicked’ Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo pay gap

Universal denies ‘Wicked’ Ariana Grande, Cynthia Erivo pay gap

Dancing through lies.

The rumor about Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo’s “Wicked” paychecks has been cleared up.

It was reported online that Grande, 31, was paid $15 million to star as Glinda the Good Witch in the two-part movie musical, while Erivo, 37, only got $1 million to play Elphaba, the Wicked Witch of the West.

However, Universal Pictures denied the alleged $14 million-difference pay gap on Tuesday.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo at the “Wicked” London premiere on November 18. WireImage

“Reports of pay disparity between Cynthia and Ariana are completely false and based on internet fodder,” a spokesperson for the film studio said in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter.

“The women received equal pay for their work on ‘Wicked,’” they added.

Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande in “Wicked.” AP

Universal did not reveal how much the pair were paid for the film.

The Post has reached out to reps for Grande and Erivo for comment.

Multiple outlets reported that Grande made more than anyone in the “Wicked” cast — despite having less screen time than Erivo.

“Wicked” stars Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande and director Jon M. Chu. AP

Even more surprising were claims that supporting cast members earned bigger paychecks than Erivo for their smaller roles: Michelle Yeoh and Jeff Goldblum were rumored to have been paid $2 million each to play Madame Morrible and the Wizard of Oz, respectively.

“Bridgerton” star Jonathan Bailey, meanwhile, was reported to have been paid $450,000 to play love interest Fiyero.

Jeff Goldblum at the “Wicked” London premiere. Getty Images
Michelle Yeoh at the “Wicked” London premiere. WireImage
Jonathan Bailey at the “Wicked” London premiere. Getty Images

“Wicked” is already a box office smash globally. It has grossed over $162 million worldwide in its first five days of cinemas.

In the US, it scored the biggest box office debut for a musical adaptation in history, with $114 million in its opening weekend.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo in “Wicked.” AP

The Jon M. Chu-directed film had a reported budget of around $150 million.

The sequel, “Wicked Part: Two,” featuring the same cast lineup, hits theaters on November 21, 2025.

Grande and Ervio were cast in the lead roles in 2021 after a long audition process.

Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo at the WSJ. Magazine Innovators Awards on October 29. Evan Agostini/Invision/AP

“I felt a little bit of the initial nervousness or the sort of preconceived notions about what I might be able to deliver or not deliver, or why I would be wrong or whatever,” Grande said about playing Glinda on the “Sentimental Men” podcast earlier this month.

The Grammy Award winner added that she understood if fans were concerned about her casting because of her pop star background.

Ariana Grande at the “Wicked” London premiere. WireImage

“I probably would’ve said the same thing. I probably would’ve said, ‘Why the fuck? Kill me. I’ve waited 20 years for this. Kill me.’ I would’ve said that — as a fan from the outside knowing of only ‘7 Rings,’ probably — I’d say, ‘Well, that’s bullshit.’ So, you know, I get it,” she said.

Erivo, meanwhile, told Variety in a recent interview that, as a Black woman, she always connected to Elphaba’s story of being an outsider.

Cynthia Erivo at the “Wicked” London premiere. Getty Images

“I feel like I’ve been given this incredible gift of a character whose raison d’etre is to show that all of your difference is what makes you special,” Erivo explained. “That you can soar above anyone’s expectations, that you can be everything you’re meant to be, and that the search to finding that can be hard, but when it happens, it can be really freeing, really beautiful.”

Chu, 45, has consistently stood by casting Erivo and Grande in the film.

Cynthia Erivo, Jon M. Chu and Ariana Grande at the “Wicked” New York premiere. Kevin Mazur/ Getty Images for Universal Pictures

“They read with different people, but at the end of the day it very much was obvious that she was Elphaba and she was Glinda,” he recently told Entertainment Weekly.

“I didn’t know that they would work. I didn’t know if they would like each other,” he added. “I had no idea the actual personalities of that, but I knew that they were right for those roles.”

decioalmeida

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *